Nvidia’s GTC convention had every thing: trillion greenback gross sales projections, graphics know-how that may yassify video video games, grand declarations that each firm wants an OpenClaw technique, and even a robotic model of the beloved snowman Olaf from Disney’s “Frozen.”
On the most recent episode of TechCrunch’s Fairness podcast, TechCrunch’s Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I recapped CEO Jensen Huang’s keynote and debated what it means for Nvidia’s future. And sure, a giant a part of our dialogue centered on poor Olaf, whose microphone needed to be turned off when he began rambling.
Even when the demo had gone flawlessly, Sean may nonetheless have had some reservations, as he famous these shows at all times deal with “the engineering challenges” and never the “actually messy grey areas” on the social aspect.
“However what occurs when a child kicks Olaf over?” Sean requested. “After which each different child who sees Olaf get kicked or knocked over has their complete journey to Disney ruined and it ruins the model?”
Learn a preview of our dialog, edited for size and readability, beneath.
Anthony: [CEO Jensen Huang] was principally saying that each firm must have an OpenClaw technique now. I feel that’s only a very grand assertion that’s meant to be consideration grabbing; I feel it’s additionally attention-grabbing coming at this sort of transitional second for OpenClaw.
The founder has gone to OpenAI. So it’s now this open supply challenge that doubtlessly can flourish and evolve past its creator, or it may languish. If corporations like Nvidia are investing quite a bit into it, then [it’s] extra doubtless that it’ll proceed to evolve. Nevertheless it’ll be attention-grabbing to see a yr from now, whether or not that appears like a prescient assertion or everybody’s like, “Open what?”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
Kirsten: Within the case of Nvidia, it prices them nothing within the grand scheme of issues to launch what they name NemoClaw, which is an open supply challenge, which they constructed with the OpenClaw creator. But when they don’t do one thing, they’ve quite a bit to lose. So actually that message to me, the best way I translated it when Jensen was like, “Each enterprise must have an OpenClaw technique,” it was, “Nvidia must have an answer or technique for enterprises, as a result of if it’s profitable, it’s one other means or one other pathway for Nvidia to be a part of quite a few different corporations.” So doing nothing is a higher danger than doing one thing that doesn’t go anyplace.
Sean: The true query right here is why have we not talked about what’s clearly the tip recreation for Nvidia, and the factor that’s going to show it into the primary $100 trillion firm, which is an Olaf robotic.
Anthony: How may I neglect?
Kirsten: Anthony, simply go to the tip of the 2 and a half hours to observe this.
So, the Olaf robotic comes out, and that is one thing that Jensen likes to do. He likes to have these demos and a few of them go higher than others. It is usually to show Nvidia’s know-how in robotics, and I don’t know if Olaf was really talking in actual time or if it was programmed — it felt a little bit programmed, or it had particular key phrases that it used.
However the biggest half about it’s that they needed to lower its mic on the finish as a result of it simply began rambling and talking to the gang. After which it went over to its little passageway and was slowly lowered. And you would see it on the video. It was nonetheless speaking, however no mic.
Sean: Now we simply want to offer this little robotic a wheelbase. And I do know the right founder who can present it.
I imply, these demos are at all times foolish. I don’t need to rise up on my soapbox, as a result of I do know that we’ve talked about this a little bit bit earlier this week, however this was a formidable demo up till the second the place it fell a little bit bit quick.
That is one other actually good instance, although, of [how] robotics is a very attention-grabbing engineering downside and a very attention-grabbing physics downside and a very attention-grabbing integration downside, and all of these items, however this was introduced as, in partnership with Disney, and it’s alleged to be the way forward for Disney parks and issues like that: You’re going to have the ability to stroll round and see Olaf from “Frozen” and take footage of them and every thing.
However these efforts by no means think about — or definitely don’t put entrance and middle in occasions like this — all the opposite issues it’s a must to think about whenever you roll stuff out like this. There’s a very good YouTuber, Defunctland, that did a very good video about this — 4 hours lengthy, not too lengthy — concerning the historical past of Disney attempting to get these sorts of robotics into their park, these automatons.
The engineering challenges are actually attention-grabbing and it’s enjoyable to see that historical past, however it at all times comes again to the identical query of: Okay, however what occurs when a child kicks Olaf over? After which each different child who sees Olaf get kicked or knocked over has their complete journey to Disney ruined and it ruins the model?
There’s simply a lot on the social aspect of this. And that sounds foolish, however that is the query that we’re form of asking about humanoid robots, too. There’s a lot hype about all this different stuff and we simply don’t actually hear as a lot dialog concerning the actually messy grey areas on the social aspect of these items, and in addition simply integrating them into folks’s lives. We solely ever actually hear concerning the engineering challenges — which once more, are actually spectacular.
Kirsten: I’ve a counterpoint after which now we have to get to our subsequent [topic]. It is a job creator, as a result of Olaf should have a human babysitter in Disneyland, most likely dressed up as Elsa or one thing else. You’ll be able to think about that truly, what we’re doing is creating jobs [with] this engineering experiment.
