On the stand, Elon Musk is positioning himself as a savior.
Why is Musk giving the jury a lot of his origin story? Although he could also be, relying on the day, the world’s wealthiest particular person, Musk prompt that each one of his enterprise ventures have been involved with the well-being of humanity. Rocket firm SpaceX was based as “Life insurance coverage for all times as we all know it”; electric-car producer Tesla was began as a result of he thought continued reliance on fossil fuels “could possibly be fairly unhealthy for the setting and humanity as a complete.” (On the stand, he dubiously claimed that he based Tesla.)
He mentioned that he has been frightened about AI in his faculty years, that it could possibly be a “double-edged sword,” one that would “remedy all of the ailments and make everybody affluent, or it might kill us all.” He prompt that AI had two outcomes: the utopian Star Trek one, or the dystopian Terminator one. He desires the long run to be extra like Gene Roddenberry’s and never like James Cameron’s. This was his intention in co-founding OpenAI.
Musk forged himself as a hero — the nice man who cares about humanity, suggesting that Altman is the alternative.
It might show to be an efficient technique, particularly when contrasted with Altman, whose background co-founding the long-forgotten social media app Loopt and his days as a accomplice at Y Combinator, would possibly sound far much less magnanimous.
Musk went so far as claiming that Altman was a thief. “It’s quite simple: it’s not okay to steal a charity. That’s my view and furthermore if the defendants are discovered not responsible, this case will change into caselaw. It’s going to change into precedent and provides precedent to looting each charity in America,” Musk mentioned. “If the decision comes out that makes it okay to loot a charity, the complete basis of charitable giving in America will probably be destroyed.”
