First, we measure workstation efficiency with SPECviewperf 2020 (model 3.1), which renders, rotates, and zooms out and in of stable and wireframe fashions at 1080p decision. The three subtests characterize PTC’s Creo CAD platform, Autodesk’s Maya modeling and simulation software program for movie, TV, and video games, and Dassault Systemes’ SolidWorks 3D rendering bundle.
Subsequent up is Blender, an open-source 3D content-creation suite for modeling, animation, simulation, and compositing. We report the time it takes for Blender 4.2 to render three distinct scenes to measure CPU and GPU rendering efficiency.
Lastly, we use PugetBench for Creators to check DaVinci Resolve Studio 18 video-editor efficiency on programs appropriate for that difficult app. These automated duties and options push the CPU and GPU, letting us gauge real-world media-creation speeds.
The Professional Max landed simply behind the highly effective Talon throughout SPECviewperf. The Velocity Micro additionally stored tempo besides in Creo, the place the specialised GPU drivers within the Professional Max and Talon delivered a transparent benefit.
Blender’s CPU take a look at scales to all out there cores and threads, permitting the Falcon and ThinkStation to flex their muscle and pull effectively forward of the Professional Max. Within the GPU portion, nonetheless (not charted right here), the Professional Max was even-keel with the Falcon, owing to their use of the identical RTX Professional 6000 GPU.
The Professional Max really whomped the group on the DaVinci Resolve benchmark, posting a dominant rating that not one of the different programs may match.
