On this “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” broadcast, moderated by Margaret Brennan:
- Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Leiter
- Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia
- GOP Rep. Mike Turner of Ohio
- Kristalina Georgieva, managing director of the Worldwide Financial Fund
Click on right here to browse full transcripts from 2026 of “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”
MARGARET BRENNAN: I am Margaret Brennan in Washington.
And this week on Face the Nation: Vice President Vance returns to the U.S. empty-handed following talks with Iranian leaders. However President Trump now says he is ordered the Navy to blockade the Strait of Hormuz.
The 21 hours of negotiations ended early this morning in Pakistan.
(Start VT)
J.D. VANCE (Vice President of the USA): The dangerous information is that we’ve not reached the settlement. And I believe that is dangerous information for Iran rather more than it is dangerous information for the USA of America.
(Finish VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: President Trump and Secretary of State Rubio acquired the information whereas they had been out for a Saturday night time on the UFC fights.
Earlier, Mr. Trump downplayed the importance of the talks.
(Start VT)
DONALD TRUMP (President of the USA): Whether or not we make a deal or not makes no distinction to me. And the reason being as a result of we’ve gained.
(Finish VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: What’s subsequent within the now 44-day warfare that has despatched fuel costs hovering world wide? Will the delicate two-week cease-fire maintain? And what precisely is President Trump’s aim within the battle?
We are going to hear from the Israeli ambassador to the U.S., Michael Leiter, the highest Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, Mark Warner, and Republican Congressman Mike Turner.
We may also take a better have a look at the warfare’s affect on the worldwide economic system with the pinnacle of the Worldwide Financial Fund, Kristalina Georgieva.
And, lastly, a bleak week winds up with a really blissful ending.
It is all simply forward on Face the Nation.
Good morning, and welcome to Face the Nation.
As we come on the air, President Trump is weighing in on the result of these talks in Pakistan, saying that – quote – “Most factors had been agreed to, however the one level that actually mattered, nuclear, was not.”
He additionally says the U.S. Navy will start a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and that any Iranian who fires at us or peaceable vessels will likely be – quote – – “blown to hell.”
There isn’t any phrase on what Mr. Trump is suggesting was agreed to at this level.
In accordance with our new CBS ballot, there may be growing concern concerning the president’s dealing with of the warfare and its affect amongst Individuals. These components and extra add as much as a brand new low in President Trump’s total job approval ranking for his second time period.
The inflation report out late final week didn’t assist. It was the worst of Mr. Trump’s second time period, exhibiting a month-to-month leap we hadn’t seen in practically 4 years.
We now have acquired extra on our ballot later within the broadcast, however we start with Saturday and Sunday’s dramatic negotiations in Pakistan between the U.S. and Iran.
Our Imtiaz Tyab experiences from Islamabad.
(Start VT)
IMTIAZ TYAB (voice-over): There was an actual sense of optimism as Vice President J.D. Vance arrived in Islamabad, together with particular envoy Steve Witkoff and the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
Simply hours earlier, the Iranian delegation had additionally arrived within the capital metropolis led by the speaker of Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, and International Minister Abbas Araghchi. It was hosted by the Pakistanis, who helped dealer the cease-fire so the talks might occur, the primary high- degree face-to-face conferences between high American and Iranian political leaders for the reason that 1979 revolution.
And after 21 hours of marathon talks, together with a number of calls to President Trump, Vice President Vance emerged at 6:00 a.m. native time.
J.D. VANCE (Vice President of the USA): We now have made very clear what our purple strains are, what issues we’re prepared to accommodate them on and what issues we’re not prepared to accommodate them on. And we’ve made that as clear as we probably might, they usually have chosen to not settle for our phrases.
IMTIAZ TYAB: In accordance with Vance, the important thing sticking level was Iran’s refusal to conform to by no means develop a nuclear weapon. Iran’s International Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, stated the U.S. made – quote – “extreme calls for,” however downplayed the obvious breakdown.
(ESMAIL BAGHAEI SPEAKING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE)
IMTIAZ TYAB: “One shouldn’t have anticipated that we might attain an settlement in a single session,” he stated.
And whereas that will not have been the Iranian delegation’s expectation to finish the punishing six-week warfare, the U.S. delegation left the talks extra definitively.
VICE PRESIDENT J.D. VANCE: We depart right here with a quite simple proposal, a technique of understanding that’s our closing and greatest supply. We are going to see if the Iranians settle for it.
IMTIAZ TYAB: Throwing into query whether or not the shaky cease-fire would maintain, if additional talks can be held, and whether or not U.S. forces would return to direct fight.
Mushahid Hussain Syed is a member of the Pakistani Senate.
Are the talks lifeless, and can we see the warfare restart?
MUSHAHID HUSSAIN SYED (Pakistani Senator): No, talks should not lifeless. There is a stalemate. However the reality is that high management met head to head. That is virtually a miracle.
And Pakistan pulled it off. So, I believe that claims lots. That reveals that either side are prepared, ready and prepared to hunt a deal.
(Finish VT)
IMTIAZ TYAB: And the Pakistani authorities has stated it was – quote – “crucial” the U.S. and Iran uphold the cease-fire and that it will additionally attempt to host additional talks within the coming days, Margaret, talks which might decide the destiny of the Strait of Hormuz and a battle which has seen international vitality costs soar and 1000’s of individuals killed.
MARGARET BRENNAN: That is Imtiaz Tyab in Pakistan.
For extra on the peace negotiations, we’re joined now by Israel’s ambassador to the USA, Dr. Michael Leiter.
Good morning. Welcome again to this system.
MICHAEL LEITER (Israeli Ambassador to the USA): Good morning, Margaret. Good to be with you.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Israel and the U.S. have been lockstep on this warfare up to now. You heard the vice chairman form of depart the door open to diplomacy, however President Trump additionally stated this morning “The U.S. is locked and loaded for an applicable second.”
Is it your understanding that Israel and the U.S. will maintain fireplace till the tip of this two-week cease-fire?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: We now have to do not forget that the president has been relentless in pursuing an finish to this disaster by talks. That is – the talks preceded the June warfare. Talks preceded Epic Fury. The talks are occurring now.
And I believe that, if we are able to conclude this disaster with Iran, with this regime, this tyrannical regime that is pursuing nuclear weapons with out going again into kinetic exercise, it will most likely be greatest for everybody.
The president continues to pursue that. However, proper now, they noticed head to head – the vice chairman sat reverse this fellow Ghalibaf, who’s straight answerable for the homicide of his personal individuals simply in January, this previous January, and simply noticed how stubborn and obstinate they’re in pursuit of nuclear weapons.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Whenever you stated the talks are nonetheless occurring, are there – is there any degree of U.S.-Iran contact at this level?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Nicely, you already know, the president gave the problem two weeks.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: And we’re simply into the tip of the primary week, so there may be one other week left for the potential for continued talks.
MARGARET BRENNAN: OK.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: We – we all know the Iranians. We all know this regime. We do not suppose they are going anyplace, but it surely’s necessary to present it an opportunity.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Vance stated “We have to see Iran give affirmative dedication to not search a nuclear weapon or the instruments that might allow them to shortly obtain a nuclear weapon.”
Is your understanding that the U.S. place is zero enrichment? Or are they nonetheless leaving the door open that Iran might have a civil – civilian nuclear program for medical functions?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Civilian nuclear program does not entail enrichment. There are 57 international locations with a civilian nuclear program that do not have enrichment. They carry the fabric in.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However they need a little bit bit. You already know that.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: No. No, if they’ve a little bit bit, then they’ll have lots.
To maneuver from 60 p.c, which they’d, to 90 p.c, look, you do not construct these manufacturing crops deep underground in case you’re doing it for medical functions. You don’t have anything to cover. These individuals lie. We should not be stunned when individuals who homicide their very own additionally lie.
This has been their pursuit. They have been chanting for 47 years, “Dying to America,” “Dying to Israel.” That is their aim.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Let’s not be paternalistic about it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However we’re negotiating with that very same regime proper now.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: We’re attempting on the similar time to – we’re negotiating them…
MARGARET BRENNAN: The exact same individuals.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: We’re negotiating them after eliminating their navy, after eliminating their air drive, after degrading their management. Hopefully, they’re going to come to their knees and say, we’re surrendering.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, the president has stated the warfare is gained. Your prime minister stated the work just isn’t but full.
Particularly, what a part of Iran nonetheless poses a army menace to Israel? Do you continue to take into account it an existential menace?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Nicely, there are three issues that we’ve to be involved with from the start, primary, the pursuit of a nuclear weapon. In the event that they return to that pursuit that considerations us.
MARGARET BRENNAN: They are saying they are not…
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Quantity two, ballistic missiles. OK, these ballistic missiles – they promised, by the best way, that they do not have a ballistic missile that would attain Europe. They lied. We noticed that they do.
They are going to flip…
(CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: You are speaking concerning the firing on Diego Garcia.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: The firing on Diego Garcia. They stated it was restricted to 2,000 kilometers. We see now they have 4,000 kilometers. It is only a dash to eight,000 kilometers and to hit Chicago or Tenafly, New Jersey.
So, that needs to be handled…
MARGARET BRENNAN: U.S. intel says 9 years.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: … and proxy. Nicely, our intel says lower than 9 years, OK?
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: And our intel has been correct on this from the very starting, OK?
Now, it was clear. We stated that they are in a dash to attain nuclear weapons. And Mr. Witkoff got here again from the talks beforehand and stated they got here in, they walked into negotiations, stated, we have 60 p.c prepared for 11 bombs.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Eleven bombs at 60 p.c implies that you bought per week or two till you bought 90 p.c and weapon-grade.
And the very last thing, Margaret, are the proxies, OK? We – this is not over till there’s a full de-linkage between Iran and its proxies, which have unfold loss of life, mayhem and destruction across the Center East.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I need to come again to that in regard to Hezbollah.
However simply to complete what you are speaking about with intelligence, there was this extremely detailed “New York Instances” report this previous week. I do know you learn it, extraordinary journalism that detailed this February 11 assembly, the place your prime minister pitched President Trump on bombing Iran.
It stated the Israeli plan was to kill the Ayatollah. Performed. Cripple Iran’s capacity to threaten its neighbors, spur a preferred rebellion in Iran, after which conduct regime change, leaving in place a secular chief.
Clearly, all these objectives weren’t achieved. Are you able to declare an finish to the warfare with out reaching that guidelines?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: To start with, all of these objectives haven’t been achieved but. It is a course of. This is not immediate soup, primary.
Quantity two, I used to be within the room at that assembly. The journalists who wrote that article weren’t. And, apparently, they obtained the knowledge second- third-hand. There’s an terrible lot in that article which merely is not true, which is a story that is being created, attention-grabbing narrative, however not correct.
So I might be very cautious about quoting from that exact article.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, particularly, what – what did they get flawed? As a result of they are saying your intelligence providers, the Mossad, argued the Iranian regime can be so weak it couldn’t choke off the Strait of Hormuz. That was flawed. Iran would have minimal…
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: No, no, we did not argue that. We argued the potential, that we have got to work in direction of that.
No – nothing was offered as a reality, that, if we do that, this would be the consequence. It isn’t science. Politics just isn’t science. Army operations should not science. We offered the case that that is what we predict must be achieved.
The president comes to a decision. This complete factor concerning the prime minister coming in…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: … and dragging the president into this, it is all, you already know, for publicity functions.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Did Mossad consider that there can be protests that might overthrow the regime and that Kurdish fighters would enter by the north?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: The Mossad thought that, as we noticed in January, a whole bunch of 1000’s and hundreds of thousands of individuals stand up, the potential for that taking place once more is even higher now.
And we nonetheless suppose it’s totally nice. We nonetheless suppose we might – that would materialize over the subsequent couple of months. However there isn’t any assure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Then why negotiate with the identical regime that’s suppressing these individuals?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Nicely, you possibly can negotiate…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Is Israel actually supportive of this diplomacy?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: You may negotiate. We’re supportive of the president and his efforts, OK?
We have been in lockstep from the start within the planning, within the implementation, and we’ll finish this factor collectively as properly. So we’re fully supportive of the president’s efforts, each diplomatically and militarily.
MARGARET BRENNAN: On the proxies, “The Jerusalem Submit” right now is writing that Israel’s warfare in Lebanon is the worth to pay for Iran reopening Hormuz.
The Israeli offensive in opposition to Hezbollah – and, for our viewers, they’re a political occasion in Lebanon they usually are also Iran’s strongest militia and proxy drive. They’ve sophisticated issues right here. The Trump administration is holding talks Tuesday in Washington. You will be on the desk with the ambassador from Lebanon. Hezbollah just isn’t a part of these talks.
In that lead-up, is Israel going to pause, scale back the strikes on Lebanon?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: If I can, some extent of correction. Hezbollah is a terrorist group…
MARGARET BRENNAN: It’s.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: … which can be a political occasion. It isn’t a political occasion which additionally has a terrorist wing. They’re a terrorist group. They are a proxy of Iran…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: … which has an agenda of destroying the state of Israel.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: They usually fireplace missiles into our cities and villages.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: And we’ve to reply.
Now, we need to negotiate with Lebanon. Lebanon and Israel can dwell in peace tomorrow. I consider – you already know, we had this preliminary telephone name on Friday. It was a convention name between myself…
MARGARET BRENNAN: You and the Lebanese ambassador.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: … Lebanese ambassador, the U.S. ambassador to Beirut, all moderated by the State Division official Mike Needham.
It was a fantastic dialog. And the factor all of us agreed upon, that, if there was – if we simply put Hezbollah on the aspect, and simply Israel and Lebanon negotiate peace…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: … two months, three months, we have an entire peace settlement.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However let me simply comply with up. You stated Israel has to reply. That is completely different relating to responding to a strike from Hezbollah versus the form of bombing that we noticed this previous week, notably on Wednesday.
The airstrikes killed greater than 350 those that day, a 3rd of them girls and kids and the aged, in line with the Lebanese Well being Ministry. The vice chairman stated Israel had agreed to examine itself with these strikes. And the president stated he spoke with Bibi, your prime minister, and he stated he will low-key it.
Are you able to clarify what low-key bombing means? Is that this a diminished cadence and quantity of strikes from Wednesday? What precisely did the U.S. and Israel conform to?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Scale back cadence, upped cadence, operational points aren’t mentioned on Sunday morning on tv.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, the president…
(LAUGHTER)
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Nicely, what we – we mentioned is that we’ll be in tandem with the president’s efforts within the Gulf, and we assist the president’s efforts.
Proper now, we’re pursuing those that are taking pictures missiles in opposition to our civilians, and the operation Wednesday was focused in opposition to operation facilities of Hezbollah. Now, what they do…
MARGARET BRENNAN: You dispute these Lebanese authorities figures of civilian deaths?
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: No, abs – oh, after all. It is like Hamas releasing figures from Gaza, their Well being Ministry.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However you are – you are negotiating with the Lebanese authorities.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: We – we – completely. Completely.
However the – typically, there’s this try to color us as, you already know, going after civilians. We’re going after, in a focused trend, the terrorist infrastructure. That is what we deal with.
Now, what they do Margaret, is that they put their operation facilities, their terrorist facilities amongst civilians. Now, we inform them to get out. They do not at all times get out, however we do what we are able to. Hamas does this in Gaza by constructing their bases inside civilian facilities. Hezbollah does it.
And we noticed the opposite day the place Tehran despatched their civilians out to the bridges and the – vitality crops…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: … so they would not be – this can be a crime in opposition to humanity.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, you may have your personal diplomacy on Tuesday, we will likely be waiting for that and what occurs. Thanks in your time this morning.
AMBASSADOR MICHAEL LEITER: Thanks.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We will likely be proper again.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We flip now to Senator Mark Warner. He is the highest Democrat on the Intelligence Committee. And he joins us from Charlottesville, Virginia.
Good morning to you, Senator.
SENATOR MARK WARNER (D-Virginia): Good morning, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I need to decide up the place we simply left off with the ambassador when he was speaking about his nation’s intelligence estimates versus ours.
He stated he was in that room that day when Prime Minister Netanyahu pitched President Trump on this warfare that the U.S. is now in. He stated these press accounts had been flawed. In your understanding of U.S. intelligence, is it true the CIA disputed the Mossad’s evaluation as farcical?
SENATOR MARK WARNER: Nicely, Margaret, I used to be not in that assembly.
I do know two issues. One, having seen all of the intelligence, there was no imminent menace from Iran in opposition to the USA. And, two, I take my former colleague and now Secretary of State Marco Rubio at his phrase when he publicly stated, properly, we knew the Israelis had been going to strike Iran, so we felt we would have liked to go forward and strike first, since Iran would assault us.
So, we’re the place we’re, however let’s – no American ought to overlook this can be a warfare of alternative chosen by the president. And if we simply shortly have a look at the objectives, regime change, frankly, the brand new management is extra radical.
Getting the enriched uranium out would require 10,000 troops minimal guarding a fringe round a bunker the place our troops must go in and get this very unstable uranium out. The Ukrainian – I am sorry – the Iranians might bomb that.
We – we have taken down numerous their ballistic missiles. However, as we have seen, they nonetheless have many left taking pictures down our planes. Thank God our army is world-class and acquired these pilots out. However they actually have 1000’s of drones left.
And this query about what the president goes to do with closing the Strait of Hormuz…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: … the Iranians have a whole bunch of speedboats the place they’ll nonetheless mine the strait or put – put bombs in opposition to tankers.
And shutting the strait, how is that going to ever carry down fuel costs?
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, two issues on that simply to comply with up. That 10,000- troop requirement, is that an official authorities estimate, and is that within the midst of fight, or is that with Iranian authorities permission to have boots on the bottom?
SENATOR MARK WARNER: This has been – this has been recognized for – there’s a motive – the Iranian regime is terrible. I agree with the ambassador on that. They have been terrible for 47 years.
However there was a motive why earlier presidents, together with President Trump in his first time period, did not select to go to warfare.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: As a result of that is terribly sophisticated.
The truth that the president acts like he is stunned the Iranians closed the strait or would assault our Gulf allies, anyone who would have learn the intelligence would’ve recognized that was first.
The power to guard our troopers would require, each estimate I’ve seen, at the least 10,000 troops guarding a fringe, sending troops into these bunkers for days on finish, very susceptible. The Iranians nonetheless have capacity to bomb their very own bunkers. That’s once more a motive why I believe motion like this has not been taken earlier than.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, CNN is reporting that – and “The New York Instances” – that China is ready to ship new air protection techniques to Iran inside the subsequent few weeks. The Israeli ambassador beforehand has acknowledged that China was contemplating serving to – serving to Iran.
How important would you describe Beijing’s assist at this level?
SENATOR MARK WARNER: I might describe it as important.
However they attempt to cover themselves. China says, properly, that is their personal sector. Everyone knows there isn’t a such factor as a real personal sector in China. Each firm in China has to have its first loyalty to the Communist Celebration.
However what we’ve achieved – let me additionally level out, Margaret, by the Trump administration releasing sanctions on Russian oil, that is $10 billion to Putin. Extra loopy is, by releasing sanctions on Iranian oil at sea, we’ve actually funded the Iranian authorities $14 billion that they are utilizing to purchase from China and elsewhere weapons to assault our troops.
That’s madness, in my thoughts.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However you are speaking there about President Trump’s efforts to attempt to, you already know, decrease oil costs by these measures.
I need to ask you, although, on the broader level, in our polling, we see broad dissatisfaction with how the administration is dealing with the warfare. However, as for, you already know, the aspirations, Individuals broadly assist them; 87 p.c say strait of Hormuz must be reopened; 81 p.c need to guarantee freedom for the Iranian individuals; 76 p.c need to completely cease Iran’s nuclear program; 55 p.c need the present leaders ousted earlier than we finish the warfare.
Do you form of need to see us end what America has began right here? Can you actually simply hit the brakes?
SENATOR MARK WARNER: Margaret, I agree with the entire objectives of the American individuals.
However once you take – ask the subsequent query, are you prepared to place your little kids in a floor warfare within the Center East to get that enriched uranium out, I’ve not discovered any volunteers on that.
The Strait of Hormuz was open earlier than this warfare began.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely…
SENATOR MARK WARNER: Gasoline in Virginia was $2.81 40 days in the past. It’s over $4 now.
Even when the president declares victory tomorrow, these excessive fuel costs will likely be with us for months.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: And it is pure fuel, not simply gasoline. Asian international locations are shutting down their economies at some point per week as a result of the worth of oil has skyrocketed a lot.
We purchase numerous stuff from Taiwan…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: … South Korea and international locations round Asia. All these costs are going up.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And we are going to – we’ll speak about that with the IMF director in a while.
However simply to place a positive level on it, does this imply you wouldn’t vote for a supplemental funding request if the president wants more cash to complete what he began?
SENATOR MARK WARNER: I’ll check out something. I need to be certain that our troops, who’ve achieved magnificently – however this president ought to have come to the American individuals and Congress first and say, I am going to decide on to go to warfare. Here is what I need to attempt to accomplish.
These 4 objectives of regime change, uranium, missiles…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: … and the Strait of Hormuz, we solely acquired these objectives about 10 days into the warfare. And on any trustworthy evaluation, I do not suppose we have completed any of them to this point.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I need to ask you, on one other subject, and that’s mainly congressional inaction.
We’re on day 58 of the shutdown of Homeland Safety, by way of this standoff in regard to funding. Republicans are making ready a plan to fund ICE and to fund a CBP on a party-line vote by a course of referred to as reconciliation.
Democrats had the standoff to demand coverage modifications that by no means occurred right here. What did Democrats truly get out of this?
SENATOR MARK WARNER: Nicely, Margaret, what we acquired out of it, at the least within the Senate, is we acquired 100-0 vote saying, let’s fund the entire remainder of DHS apart from ICE.
That ought to have, we assume – you had each Republican senator vote for that. After which the speaker of the Home, who can not seem to determine what he needs, rejected it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: I’m glad that the president has gone forward and paying the salaries.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: However I believe in case you ask your similar ballot questions, do the American individuals need ICE operating round cities…
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: … frankly, arresting not solely undocumented, however Individuals…
MARGARET BRENNAN: OK.
SENATOR MARK WARNER: … and placing Individuals’ lives in jeopardy, as we noticed in Minneapolis, I do not suppose they need that occurring as properly.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator – OK, Senator, I’ve a tough break I acquired to take right here. Thanks very a lot for becoming a member of us.
We’ll be proper again.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We will likely be proper again. Stick with us.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome again to “FACE THE NATION.”
Individuals are rising more and more involved concerning the warfare with Iran and its affect. Our newest CBS Information ballot finds, because the approval of Donald Trump’s dealing with of the battle has dropped to 36 p.c, again dwelling the president’s scores on dealing with of inflation are on the lowest degree of his second time period with solely 31 p.c approving.
For extra we’re joined by our government director of elections and surveys, Anthony Salvanto.
Good to have you ever right here, Anthony.
ANTHONY SALVANTO: Good morning, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, what precisely are Individuals telling you?
ANTHONY SALVANTO: Nicely, after I simply requested how this warfare is making you’re feeling, the highest solutions individuals give are “fearful” and “harassed.” Let’s unpack that. Why?
After they look abroad, they see numerous necessary objectives for the U.S. Huge, bipartisan majorities suppose it is crucial too. You may go down the listing. Cease Iran’s nuclear program. Be certain the Iranian persons are secure and free. Change the regime. Change the management in Iran. And, most necessary, open the Strait of Hormuz.
And what you see is attention-grabbing is once you juxtapose that and ask them, properly, have these issues been achieved, you see a dramatically completely different reply as a result of only a few individuals suppose that they’ve. What that collectively tells you is, this appears to be like to individuals like unfinished enterprise. There are objectives. OK, the warfare started. Not all people appreciated it. However now they’re saying, be certain that it pays off in ways in which come again to the U.S.
And let me decide up on that phrase “pays off” for a second as a result of after they speak about opening the Strait, so actually speaking about fuel costs.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
ANTHONY SALVANTO: And what we have seen is individuals right here telling us these increased fuel costs are a monetary hardship, tough to pay. And so that’s having an affect, each on their views of the economic system extra usually, in addition to their pocketbooks. And also you talked about these scores on the high. Look, form of like first rule of politics, fuel costs and costs go up and approval scores begin to go down.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, the president at all times makes use of social media to make, you already know, massive statements of intent. Just a few days in the past he posted a very incendiary one. It stated, quote, “an entire civilization will die tonight, by no means to be introduced again once more. I do not need that to occur.” That assertion drew rebukes from even among the president’s closest supporters in addition to the pope.
You gauged response to that rhetoric. What did the American public suppose?
ANTHONY SALVANTO: So, by the point we acquired to speaking to the those that had heard and seen that publish, and after we confirmed it to them, the final view was, they disliked it. There have been some who stated, OK, a little bit bit extra like, and people had been people within the MAGA base, not all, however comparatively extra.
Nevertheless it’s additionally a window into how individuals course of a few of these statements. And we have been taking a look at this for ten years, which are, if you’ll, shattering norms or altering the best way issues have been achieved previously. And that’s they thought it was at the least as a lot a negotiating tactic because it was an intention.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, how does all of that affect how the general public views the president’s management?
ANTHONY SALVANTO: So, one constant factor by this warfare is that most individuals have stated they do not really feel the administration has clearly defined the objectives. I adopted up on that this week and most people who really feel that manner suppose it is that the objectives have saved altering that they’ve heard. Not that they have not articulated something.
So, there’s that big range they usually’re not clear which one precisely. That pertains to most individuals saying they do not really feel Donald Trump has a transparent plan for this battle. These two issues collectively communicate to that collective uncertainty about it, if you’ll. And when there’s uncertainty, you inevitably begin to see scores total and the sensation that the warfare is not going properly but happening.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Anthony Salvanto, attention-grabbing stuff. Thanks.
ANTHONY SALVANTO: Thanks.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And we’ll be proper again with much more “FACE THE NATION.” Stick with us.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’re again now with Republican Congressman Mike Turner.
Thanks for coming again to city early to speak to us in particular person.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER (R-OH): Thanks.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Let’s begin on our polling since you, like many individuals proper now, are operating for re-election, proper? You have a look at these – this ballot. Sixty-four p.c of the American individuals disapprove of the warfare, 62 p.c say that the president has no clear plan. There are these damaging perceptions of the president’s dealing with of the economic system and inflation. Dayton is not immune. Gasoline costs up $1 from the place they had been similar time final yr. How are you explaining to individuals in your district that this warfare is price it?
Nicely, first off, no battle ever polls properly. And when there was a battle occurring, nobody says it is being dealt with properly, since you – you need to – to undergo the battle. The president has articulated, I believe very properly, that that is about making certain that Iran doesn’t change into a nuclear state. And nobody is prepared to commerce decrease fuel costs for Iran turning into a nuclear state.
And when Vice President Vance stood on the podium and stated that the negotiations had damaged off as a result of Iran was not prepared to declare that they might not change into a nuclear state, that ought to have despatched a chill each by Europe and world wide. And I believe, you already know, for everybody as a result of that really is what that is about. That places away what, you already know, what Senator Warner was attempting to dismissively say, that this was not an imminent menace and what everybody else has been saying in Europe and world wide of – of the –
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, the president says it is an ambition.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: However that that is a right away – the IAEA, Grossi, the director, had stated they had been weeks away from being – having sufficient materials to have a nuclear bomb.
MARGARET BRENNAN: He stated there was no proof that they had been pursuing a nuclear weapon. He could not rule it out.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: He stated they had been – they had been weeks – they had been weeks away. And now you may have it. Now not can individuals say that they didn’t – they didn’t have the ambition. Right here they’re, all the best way on the desk, they’ve been on this – this huge battle.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: They usually’re unwilling to say they don’t seem to be going to pursue –
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure, and the American individuals, in our polling –
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: They’re unwilling to pursue a nuclear weapon.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Are for stopping that. Nevertheless, the negotiation itself is proof of the truth that militarily you can not obtain destruction of a nuclear ambition, is it not?
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: And the – and the president has stated that this
MARGARET BRENNAN: What’s ongoing?
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: This battle, this act, the negotiations. This isn’t –
MARGARET BRENNAN: However the president stated the warfare is gained.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: This isn’t – that is – this isn’t over. And as it isn’t over, Iran goes to have to come back to the conclusion, as – as are – you keep in mind, the JCPOA, the unique enrichment deal –
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: That Obama negotiated –
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: The place he stated, we’re not going to permit them to have a nuclear weapon however we’re simply going to observe –
MARGARET BRENNAN: They usually did not have a nuclear weapon.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: And the place we’ll watch them –
MARGARET BRENNAN: They usually haven’t got a nuclear weapon now.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: And we’ll watch them enrich till they get shut sufficient after which we’ll take army motion.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Each – Europe, everybody was a celebration to the deal.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: This isn’t simply the USA –
MARGARET BRENNAN: However the president’s saying they nonetheless will not conform to not get a nuclear weapon and we won’t cease them.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: This isn’t only a United States difficulty. As we noticed throughout this battle, the place Iran, of their missile applied sciences, despatched a missile all the best way to Diego Garcia. This was a wake-up name for Europe. They now have missile know-how that may attain Europe.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: It is a regime, a terrorist regime, that we can’t enable to have a nuclear weapon.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, you stated the president has been very clear right here in his objectives and intent. Our polling exhibiting the American individuals aren’t persuaded in the identical manner you might be. Let me run by among the issues he stated on the Hormuz Strait.
On the outset of the warfare March third he stated the Navy would start escorting tankers. “It doesn’t matter what, the U.S. will make sure the free stream of vitality to the world.” March ninth he stated he was stilling occupied with taking it over. March fifteenth he stated it was another person’s downside. Our allies would deal with it. Perhaps we should not even be there. We do not want it. We now have numerous oil. Six days later he threatened on-line the U.S. would assault Iran’s energy crops if it did not open the Strait inside 48 hours. March twenty sixth he went again to blaming allies, saying he is disillusioned in NATO.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Margaret, in any battle there’s going to be – – a battle goes to be fluid.
MARGARET BRENNAN: After which he introduced a two-week ceasefire, saying Iran had agreed to open the Strait.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: A battle is –
MARGARET BRENNAN: I am not achieved. As a result of yesterday he stated –
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: A battle goes to be fluid.
MARGARET BRENNAN: That CENTCOM introduced they’re sending two ships to set the circumstances for clearing mines. This morning he stated the Navy goes to begin blockading the Strait and interdict ships.
Is that the ultimate reply? I imply are you able to see right here why the general public does not suppose that the president has a transparent technique?
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Margaret, your adversary – your adversary has – your adversary has a vote on this too, they usually have a place in it too, which there have been simply negotiations simply yesterday.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Choose a place. They alter with the times.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Simply yesterday there have been negotiations. And actually, Iran had a possibility simply yesterday to say to the world, we aren’t going to pursue a nuclear weapon. Are you able to think about, the most important exporter of terrorist –
MARGARET BRENNAN: However on the Strait of Hormuz, which is the factor that is inflicting your fuel costs in Dayton to go up is what I am asking you.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: A terrorist regime having a nuclear weapon. They’ve been enriching – they’ve been enriching uranium. They’ve been enriching to the purpose the place the IAEA, the pinnacle of the IAEA stated they had been weeks away from having sufficient to have a nuclear weapon.
MARGARET BRENNAN: There has not been a single congressional listening to on this difficulty. Nobody’s disagreeing it is an necessary one. Since this warfare started, you may have been in session for 11 days, Congressman.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: There have been – there have been hearings on – there have been hearings on Iran’s nuclear ambitions for many years.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you suppose that is ample oversight of this warfare?
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: There have been a long time of – properly, truly, we’ve had labeled briefings on this difficulty. Now, that is – that is an ongoing battle. There are going to be continued briefings. I believe the administration definitely might and definitely – the chairman of the Armed Providers Committee has chastised the division on needing to supply Congress with extra data. However we have had labeled briefings. However the difficulty that is the crux of this, that Iran can’t be permitted to have a nuclear weapon, which is what the vice chairman stood earlier than the world –
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: And stated that Iran is unwilling to declare, simply yesterday –
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Which was the breaking level of the negotiations, has been the topic of hearings for many years.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Have you learnt what the president means when he says that the USA Navy is now going to be blockading the Strait of Hormuz that we try to open? Has that been briefed to Congress?
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: I believe – I believe – I believe – properly, after all not, as a result of it was simply – it was simply introduced, as you had been discussing, this morning.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, if it was a transparent technique all alongside, and this was a part of the plan, you’d suppose it had been.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: What’s – what is evident within the technique is the president has stated is the Straits should not only a United States’ difficulty. Additionally it is a Europe difficulty. It’s a worldwide difficulty. And Iran shouldn’t be permitted –
MARGARET BRENNAN: And the president stated right now we’ve to re-examine NATO due to that.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Iran shouldn’t be permitted to manage the Strait. And it isn’t only a United States difficulty.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Did they mine it?
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: And the – and Iran should not be permed to simply determine who will get by. And Europe, our NATO allies, others who’ve definitely an curiosity within the Straits, must be coming to the desk and they need to not simply be a U.S. difficulty. And the president, by saying we’re not simply going to allow them to determine who will get by, is definitely calling all of our allies and everybody to the desk of, this must be addressed.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Did they mine the Strait of Hormuz? As a result of within the tweet right now the president additionally stated they won’t have.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Nicely, I believe –
MARGARET BRENNAN: As a result of he stated no ship –
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: I believe you will need to ask the president. It is his tweet.
MARGARET BRENNAN: However that is the purpose, that Congress has not been briefed on that.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: It is his tweet. You already know, I believe – I believe you will need to ask the president.
MARGARET BRENNAN: As a member on Oversight and Armed Providers, do you’re feeling like this has truly been adequately defined to you, as a result of the American public doesn’t.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: The president simply tweeted this, this morning. So, you will need to ask the president.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’d like to ask the president.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: I wager you’d.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Or the secretary of state, or the secretary of protection. However members of Congress from his occasion are the one ones sitting right here right now. And we do recognize you answering questions on it.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Thanks, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: All proper. We’ll be proper again.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: On Friday we spoke with the managing director of the IMF, Kristalina Georgieva, right here in Washington. And we started by asking her concerning the warfare’s affect on the worldwide economic system.
(BEGIN VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: How do you calculate the financial shock from this Mideast warfare?
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA (Managing Director, Worldwide Financial Fund): We have a look at the dimensions of the affect and the period of affect. And what I can inform you is that this shock is massive, 13 p.c of oil, 20 p.c of fuel that might have flown on the planet is now caught for 5 weeks and counting. It’s international. Everyone makes use of vitality. Everyone feels the pinch of costs going up. And it’s uneven. It impacts completely different international locations in a different way. In case you are within the vicinities of the battle, it is a massive hit on you. In case you are an oil importer, it’s a massive hit on you. When you’ve got no reserves to guard your self, you might be in a really powerful state of affairs.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It seems like Asia bore numerous the financial affect right here. South Korea, they have a giant laptop chip trade. They’ve known as on their residents to preserve vitality. India, they’re rationing vitality. The Philippines had a nationwide vitality emergency.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: The Australian fuel stations are operating out of gasoline. It looks as if there’s a big a part of the planet that is actually in ache.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: Oh sure. Persons are hurting. They’re hurting due to sheer lack of portions. In case you are within the Philippines, you might be queuing the identical manner individuals had been queuing right here within the ’70s to fill your tank. They’re hurting as a result of they could be in want of helium for semiconductors or for MRIs. And now –
MARGARET BRENNAN: And that comes out of Qatar, out of the Center East.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: That comes out of Qatar. And now it’s minimize to dimension. They might be hurting due to fertilizers. Now could be the planting season. In case you are not getting fertilizers or not getting them at an inexpensive value, we may even see spike in meals costs coming. They’re hurting due to remittances. Simply suppose how many individuals dwell within the gulf, work within the gulf, ship cash dwelling to locations like India and Bangladesh.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: And this cash just isn’t coming. They’re hurting due to transportation.
I will inform you, my coronary heart goes for Sri Lanka. A rustic that’s popping out of a giant shock. They had been now affected as a result of a 3rd of flights to Sri Lanka undergo the gulf. Now tourism goes to be – to be hammered.
So, for a lot of, many causes international locations are affected. And once you have a look at the dimensions of the affect, it depends upon how a lot your reliance on imports is. Nevertheless it additionally depends upon what’s your fiscal place. Do you may have capability to soak up the shocks?
MARGARET BRENNAN: Proper.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: Guess (ph) who has this capability? Poor, susceptible international locations. Whether or not they’re in Asia or in sub-Saharan Africa, they’re being hammered dramatically. And after we talk about our response, we are going to zero in on this extremely susceptible international locations.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right here, Individuals, they’re nonetheless spending, they’re nonetheless driving, however they’ve seen inflation go up.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: Uh-huh.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Costs on the fuel pump.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: Proper. I imply, the U.S. is within the class of nations which are considerably much less impacted as a result of U.S. is vitality exporter. However, as I stated, all people feels the pinch of costs going up. Why? It is a damaging provide shocks. You may have much less vitality, however the demand remains to be the identical. What occurs? Costs go up. And right here in the USA, individuals haven’t fairly but seen inflation happening to focus on. We had been projecting this to occur by early ’27. Now that could be considerably delayed. And what does it imply? It implies that individuals expertise assaults on their revenue. Who’s most affected? After all low-income a part of the inhabitants.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Nicely, at one level oil costs surged practically 50 p.c due to this warfare in Iran.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: Uh-huh.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And also you known as it the most important disruption to international vitality markets in trendy historical past. Will increase, as you stated, to fertilizer, to different costs which are going to push up meals. Do you see this affect stretching by 2026, even when we get a ceasefire that sticks?
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: So, the affect is baked in. As a result of already the tankers that ought to have arrived in Asia haven’t arrived, proper? So, we have already got that affect. However then on high of it we’ve the infrastructure affect. Seventy-two vitality services have been hit. One-third of them extreme harm. You are taking the fuel subject in Qatar –
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: It will take three to 5 years to succeed in its full capability. That has significance. After which we’ve different infrastructure impacts, like refineries. If they do not obtain oil on the common schedule, they need to shut down. After they shut all the way down to restart, that’s with delays. So, sure, we’re going to see some drag of this disaster over the yr.
But when we’ve peace, after all circumstances are possible to enhance quicker. Above all, as a result of confidence goes to profit from the information that there’s a decision of the preventing.
Earlier than – one thing that may be very, essential to acknowledge, the world economic system has been extremely resilient.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It has.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: We now have been hit by one shock and one other and one other. We had been truly projecting a small improve for development in 2026 had it not been for this warfare. Now we’re going to have a downgrade. And the dimensions of this downgrade will depend upon these two issues, period and pace with which every little thing can come again to the identical degree of manufacturing that we had earlier than.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you suppose that international economists actually overestimated the damaging affect of the Trump tariffs?
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: Oh, superb query. So, the Funds (ph), when the tariffs got here, was among the many only a few establishments that weren’t projecting recession. We did undertaking some slowdown in development. We did see some slowdown in development.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mentioned it will be considerably disruptive.
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: We thought it will be considerably disruptive. It was considerably disruptive. However then what occurred was an adjustment. Adjustment in the USA with agreements which have diminished the strain that tariffs would put right here and on the remainder of the world. And we noticed the remainder of the world saying, OK, let’s have a look at how we are able to commerce extra with one another. Large improve in commerce agreements. Extra consideration to regional commerce. If you happen to have a look at a spot like –
MARGARET BRENNAN: You are saying turning away from the U.S.?
KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: Nicely, the U.S. is saying we need to have an economic system that’s principally primarily based on investing at dwelling. I believe manufacturing at dwelling. That is a alternative that the nation is making. Different international locations are trying into their financial future. Small, open economies, they haven’t any alternative. They’ve to seek out methods to commerce with one another. As a result of in any other case it will be very expensive for his or her individuals.
So, the developments are comparatively calming in a way that we see commerce like water. You set an impediment, it goes round it.
(END VT)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Our full dialog might be seen on our YouTube channel, web site and our podcast.
We’ll be proper again.
(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Now to some excellent news. The Artemis II mission has ended and it was an ideal splashdown for NASA and its crew, with the capsule Integrity touchdown into in Pacific Ocean simply off the coast of San Diego Friday night. NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and Canadian Jeremy Hansen mirrored on their extraordinary mission Saturday after being reunited with their households.
(BEGIN VC)
REID WISEMAN, NASA ASTRONAUT: I might counsel to you that once you search for right here, you are not taking a look at us. We’re a mirror reflecting you. And in case you like what you see, then simply look a little bit deeper. That is you.
(END VC)
MARGARET BRENNAN: The 4 spent simply over 9 days touring to the far aspect of the moon. Farther than any human had been.
(BEGIN VC)
VICTOR GLOVER, NASA ASTRONAUT: The gratitude of seeing what we noticed, doing what we did and being with who I used to be with, it is too massive to simply be in a single physique.
CHRISTINA KOCH, NASA ASTRONAUT: I do know I have not discovered every little thing that this journey has but to show me. However there’s one new factor I do know, and that’s, planet earth, you’re a crew.
JEREMY HANSEN, NASA ASTRONAUT: It is a particular factor to be a human and it is a particular factor to be on planet earth.
(END VC)
MARGARET BRENNAN: That is it for us right now. Thanks all for watching. Till subsequent week. For “FACE THE NATION,” I am Margaret Brennan.
Face The Nation Transcripts
Extra
